<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Utilitarianism on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Utilitarianism on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>General Remarks</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-1/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- SEVENTH EDITION 1879, orig 1859, principles of political ecoomy 1848--&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- CHAPTER IV. OF WHAT SORT OF PROOF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY IS SUSCEPTIBLE&#xA;CHAPTER V. OF THE CONNEXION BETWEEN JUSTICE AND UTILITY&#xA;UTILITARIANISM. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- There are few circumstances among those which make up the present condition of human knowledge, more unlike what might have been expected, or more significant of the backward state in which speculation on the most important subjects still lingers, than the little progress which has been made in the decision of the controversy respecting the criterion of right and wrong.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What is the foundation of morality?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Utilitarianism?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-2/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;People who use utility as the moral basis usually make the ignorant blunder of defining utility as being opposed to pleasure.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- An apology is due to the philosophical opponents of utilitarianism, for even the momentary appearance of confounding them with any one capable of so absurd a misconception; which is the more extraordinary, inasmuch as the contrary accusation, of referring everything to pleasure, and that too in its grossest form, is another of the common charges against utilitarianism= &#xA;&#xA;and, as has been pointedly remarked by an able writer, the same sort of persons, and often the very same persons, denounce the theory &#34;as impracticably dry when the word utility precedes the word pleasure, and as too practicably voluptuous when the word pleasure precedes the word utility.&#34;  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Pro-utility writers, from Epicurus to Bentham, defined it not something as different from pleasure, but pleasure itself. It includes an exemption from pain.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Remarks</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-2b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-2b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- It would be absurd that while, in estimating all other things, quality is considered as well as quantity, the estimation of pleasures should be supposed to depend on quantity alone. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What is this difference of quality in pleasures? What makes one pleasure more valuable than another?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Ultimate Sanction Of The Principle Of Utility</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What are the motives to obey a moral standard? What is the source of its obligation? Whence does it derive its binding force?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- though frequently assuming the shape of an objection to the utilitarian morality, as if it had some special applicability to that above others, really arises in regard to all standards.  --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Moral standards arise whenever a person is called on to adopt a standard or refer morality to any basis on which he has not been accustomed to rest it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Proofs are Needed by The Principle Of Utility</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-4/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-4/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ordinarily, ultimate ends do not admit of proof. To be incapable of proof by reasoning is common to all first principles; to the first premises of our knowledge, as well as to those of our conduct.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Connection Between Justice And Utility</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the strongest obstacles to the doctrine that Utility or Happiness is the criterion of right and wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This has been drawn from the idea of Justice which is the powerful sentiment that resembles instinct.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Communists</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some Communists consider it unjust that the produce of the labour of the community should be shared only based on &lt;!-- any other principle than that of --&gt; exact equality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The essential ingredients in the sentiment of justice</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The 2 essential ingredients in the sentiment of justice are:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The desire to punish a person who has done harm&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The knowledge or belief that there is some definite individual/s to whom harm has been done.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The desire to punish a person who has done harm to some individual, is a spontaneous outgrowth from 2 sentiments:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Utility is an uncertain standard</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5g/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/mill/utilitarianism/chapter-5g/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Utility is an uncertain standard which every different person interprets differently. There is no safety but in the immutable, ineffaceable, and unmistakeable dictates of Justice, which carry their evidence in themselves, and are independent of the fluctuations of opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
