<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Knowledge and Probability on Superphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Knowledge and Probability on Superphysics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What is Knowledge?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-01/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-01/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;knowledge-is-based-on-the-resemblance-contrariety-quality-and-quantity-of-ideas-to-each-other&#34;&gt;Knowledge is Based on the Resemblance, Contrariety, Quality, and Quantity of Ideas to Each Other&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There are 7 kinds of philosophical relation:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Resemblance&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Identity&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Relations of time and place&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Proportion in quantity or number&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Degrees in any quality&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Contrariety&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Causation&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;These relations are divided into 2 classes:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Probability and the Idea of Cause and Effect</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-02/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-02/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;knowledge-is-based-on-four-relations-reason-and-understanding-is-based-on-one-relation-causation&#34;&gt;Knowledge is Based on Four Relations, Reason and Understanding is Based on One Relation: Causation&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Those 4 relations of resemblance, contrariety, quality, and quantity are the foundation of science.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The other 3 relations do not depend on the idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Motion Transfer in Bodies</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-02b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-02b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We impulsively think of motion in Body 1 as the cause of motion in Body 2.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When we consider these objects with utmost attention, we find only that:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Body 1 approaches Body 2, and&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The motion of Body 2 comes from Body 1, but without any sensible interval.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It is in vain to rack ourselves thinking about this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Existence Does Not Always Need a Cause</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-03/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-03/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- ## Existence Does Not Always Need a Cause --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Philosophy has a general maxim: whatever exists must have a cause of existence.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- This is accepted without any proof given or demanded. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is founded on intuition, which is a kind of conviction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Causes Need to be Perceived</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-inference-to-a-cause-eventually-requires-evidence-of-that-cause&#34;&gt;The Inference to a Cause Eventually Requires Evidence of that Cause&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA; &lt;!-- an Immediate Perception or an Inference from an Impression --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In its reasonings on [real] causes or effects, the mind carries its view beyond the objects it perceives or remembers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ideas from Memory are Stronger than Ideas from Imagination</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-05/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-05/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- ## The Initial Impressions Come from the Memory, Imagination, and Senses --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We use mixed and heterogeneous materials when we think of causes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;These materials are essentially different from each other no matter how connected they are.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;All our arguments on causes and effects consist of:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Inference from the Impression to the Idea</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-constant-conjunction-between-cause-and-effect-comes-from-experience&#34;&gt;The Constant Conjunction Between Cause and Effect Comes from Experience&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- The inference we draw from cause to effect is not derived merely from:&#xA;- a survey of these particular objects, and&#xA;- a penetration into the essences of such objects to discover the dependence of one objects on the other.&#xA;&#xA;No object implies the existence of any other object if we:&#xA;- consider these objects in themselves, and&#xA;- never look beyond the ideas which we form of them.&#xA;&#xA;Such an inference would:&#xA;- amount to knowledge, and&#xA;- imply the absolute contradiction and impossibility of conceiving anything different.&#xA;&#xA;But as all distinct ideas are separable, there can be no impossibility of that kind.&#xA;&#xA;When we pass from a present impression to the idea of any object, we might:&#xA;- separate the idea from the impression, and&#xA;- substitute any other idea in its room. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We infer the existence of one object from the existence of another object only through experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Probability?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Probability only discovers the relations of objects, not the relations of ideas.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It must be founded on our perceptions and ideas.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- - the impressions of our memory and senses, and&#xA;- our ideas.  mixture of any impression --&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;If there were no perceptions in our probable reasonings, the conclusion would be chimerical.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;If there were no mixture of ideas, the mind&amp;rsquo;s action in observing the relation would be sensation, not reasoning.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In all probable reasonings, there must therefore be some perception or thing present to the mind, either seen or remembered.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cause and Effect is based on Perceptions</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-06c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;reason-cannot-explain-the-connection-of-cause-and-effect-because-that-connection-is-based-on-impressions&#34;&gt;Reason Cannot Explain the Connection of Cause and Effect Because that Connection is Based on Impressions&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Our reason fails to discover the ultimate connection of causes and effects.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Even after experience has informed us of their constant conjunction, we cannot extend that experience beyond those observed instances.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Nature of Idea or Belief</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-07/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-07/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;a-belief-is-a-strong-idea-that-gives-ideas-more-force&#34;&gt;A Belief is a Strong Idea that Gives Ideas More Force&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The idea of an object is an essential part of the belief of it, but not the whole.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We conceive many things which we do not believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Maxim on the Transferrence of Force from Impressions</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-08/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-08/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;beliefs-are-strengthened-by-impressions&#34;&gt;Beliefs are Strengthened by Impressions&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Belief consists in a lively idea related to a present impression.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What bestows the vivacity on the idea?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!--  let us examine:&#xA;- its principles, and&#xA;- what . --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I establish another general maxim: &amp;ldquo;when any impression becomes present to us, it transports the mind to related ideas and also communicates its force and vivacity.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Causes of Belief</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-08b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-08b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Causation has the same influence as the two other relations of resemblance and contiguity.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Superstitious people are fond of the relics of saints and holy men because they seek images to:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reality is a system made up of current perceptions and ideas and those from memory</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- In Addition to Cause and Effect, the Contiguity and Resemblance of Ideas Influence Belief --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;My principles apply to beliefs.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- We must turn the subject of belief on every side to find some new points of view from which we may illustrate such fundamental principles. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Philosophers correctly hesitate to accept any new hypothesis.&#xA;&#xA;They require their objections to that new hypothesis be addressed. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- This hesitation is so necessary to the examination of truth.&#xA;&#xA;It deserves to be complied with.&#xA;&#xA;It requires that:&#xA;- every argument be produced to satisfy that hesitation, and&#xA;- every objection removed, which may stop them in their reasoning.&#xA;&#xA;This:&#xA;- deserves to be complied with, and&#xA;- requires that every:&#xA;  - argument be produced to satisfy them, and&#xA;  - objection be removed which may stop them in their reasoning. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Besides cause and effect, resemblance and contiguity convey the mind from one idea to another.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Relation of Cause and Effect</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cause and effect has all the opposite advantages.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The objects it presents are fixed and unalterable.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- The impressions of the memory never change in any considerable degree.&#xA;&#xA;Each impression draws along with it a precise idea, which takes its place in the imagination as something solid and real, certain and invariable. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The thought is always determined to pass from the impression to the idea, and from that particular impression to that particular idea, without any choice or hesitation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Religion</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-09c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Men are concerned what happens after death.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The lack of resemblance in this case so entirely destroys belief.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Very few people truly believe in the soul&amp;rsquo;s immortality in the same way as travelers and historians believe their own testimonies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Influence of Belief</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-10/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-10/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;impressions-and-ideas-are-balanced-by-nature&#34;&gt;Impressions and Ideas are Balanced by Nature&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Philosophy derides education as a fallacious assent to any opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, education prevails in the world.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Education is the cause why all systems are apt to be initially rejected as new and unusual.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poets Adds Vivacity to Ideas</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-10b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-10b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Poets are liars by profession.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;They always try to give an air of truth to their fictions.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Where truth is totally neglected, their performances, however ingenious, will never be able to afford much pleasure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Probability of Chances</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-11/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-11/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;chance-is-the-negation-of-cause&#34;&gt;Chance is the Negation of Cause&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- To show the full force and evidence of this system, we must:&#xA;- view its consequences, and&#xA;- explain from the same principles some other species of reasoning derived from the same origin.&#xA;&#xA;The following philosophers are obliged to comprehend all our arguments from causes or effects under the general term of probability:&#xA;- Those who have:&#xA;  - divided human reason into knowledge and probability, and&#xA;  - defined the reason to be that evidence which arises from the comparison of ideas.&#xA;&#xA;Everyone is free to use his words in what sense he pleases. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Many arguments from causation exceed probability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chance is merely the negation of a cause</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-11b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-11b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This superiority of cause over chance can be easily seen in a die that has four sides with one dot and two sides with two dots.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Dice --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The mind here is:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Probability of Causes</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;there-are-3-origins-of-chances-experience-contrariety-analogy&#34;&gt;There are 3 Origins of Chances: Experience, Contrariety, Analogy&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I explain the probability of chances to explain the probability of causes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Philosophers say that what the vulgar call &#39;chance&#39; is just a secret and concealed cause.&#xA;Therefore, we must examine the probability of causes. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;All the probabilities of causes are derived from the association of ideas to a present impression.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Contrary Events</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A contrariety of past events might make us hesitate by producing an imperfect transition from the present impression to the related idea.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When the conjunction of 2 objects is frequent but not constant, the mind passes from one object to the other.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Contrary Events</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I propose 3 subtle considerations to justify probability arising fron contrariety.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Just reasoning should retain its force, however subtle, in the same way as matter preserves its solidity:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;in the air, fire, and animal spirits, and&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;in the grosser and more sensible forms.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;No probability is so great as not to allow of a contrary possibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analogy as a Kind of Probability and Origin of Chance</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12e/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12e/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;3-analogy-as-a-kind-of-probability-and-origin-of-chance&#34;&gt;3. Analogy as a Kind of Probability and Origin of Chance&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- There is a third kind of probability arising from analogy. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This differs from the two in some material circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Contrary Events</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-12d/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- Here is almost the same argument in a different light. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;All our reasonings on  the probability of causes are founded on the transferring of past to future.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The transferring of any past experiment to the future is enough to give us a view of the object whether:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Kinds of Unphilosophical Probability</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- All these kinds of probability are:&#xA;- received by philosophers, and&#xA;- allowed to be reasonable foundations of belief and opinion. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There are 4 kinds of unphilosophical probability derived from the same principles.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4: Unphilosophical Probability From Hasty General Rules</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;ol start=&#34;4&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Another unphilosophical kind of probability is that derived from hasty general rules, which:&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;we rashly form to ourselves, and&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;are the source of prejudice.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;An example is: &amp;ldquo;An Irishman cannot have wit and a Frenchman cannot have solidity.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Nature of General Rules</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;According to my system, all reasonings are nothing but the effects of custom.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Custom only influences by:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;enlivening the imagination, and&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;giving us a strong conception of anything&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA; &lt;!-- object. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- We can conclude that: --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Our judgment and imagination can never be contrary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indirect Speech</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-13d/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Indirect speech is a mark of greater respect than direct speech.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes direct insults that we throw are less displeasing than indirect satire because it revenges us for the injury done to us.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cause and Effect Need to be Tied to Each Other</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-efficacy-of-causes-creates-a-needed-and-consequential-connection-from-its-effects&#34;&gt;The Efficacy of Causes Creates a Needed and Consequential Connection from Its Effects&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- I have explained how we:&#xA;- reason beyond our immediate impressions, and&#xA;- conclude that such causes must have such effects --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Why do cause and effect need to be connected to each other? (Section 2)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deity as the Cause</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14b/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14b/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Some maintain that bodies operate by their substantial form.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Others, by their accidents or qualities.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Several, by their matter and form.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Some, by their form and accidents.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Others, by certain virtues and faculties distinct from all this.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;All these feelings again:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Matter and Will as the Cause</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14c/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14c/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-matter-as-the-cause&#34;&gt;The Matter as the Cause&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Other philosophers maintain the efficacy of second causes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They attribute a derivative, real power and energy to matter.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They confess that this energy does not lie in any of the known qualities of matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is the Nature of Creative Power?</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14d/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Power cannot subsist alone.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;It is always regarded as an attribute of some being or existence.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We must be able to:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;place this power in some particular being, and&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;conceive that being as endowed with a real force and energy which causes such effects.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We must distinctly and particularly:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repetition Does Not Create Nor Discover Any Innate Power</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14e/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14e/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;[The inability of repetition to create an original idea is proven by:]&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The repetition of like objects in like relations of succession and contiguity discovers nothing new in any one of them, since we cannot:&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;draw any inference from it, nor&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;make it a subject of our demonstrative or probable reasonings (Section 6).&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If we could draw an inference, it would be of no consequence in the present case, since no kind of reasoning can create a new idea such as this idea of power.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Power in Causes and Effects is Created by the Mind</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14f/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14f/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This propensity of the mind to imbue its impressions on objects is why we think that necessity and power lies in the objects we consider, and not in our mind that considers them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Definition of Cause</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14g/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-14g/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;a-cause-is-contiguous-and-precedent-to-or-united-with-its-effect-and-is-discovered-by-experience&#34;&gt;A Cause is Contiguous and Precedent to or United with its Effect and is Discovered by Experience&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- We now collect all parts of this reasoning to form an exact definition of cause and effect.&#xA;&#xA;We will first examine our inference from cause and effect before explaining cause and effect itself, because it is impossible to do it in a reverse way.&#xA;The nature of cause and effect depends so much on its inference, that we have been obliged to:&#xA;advance in this seemingly preposterous way, and&#xA;use terms before we were able exactly to define them.&#xA;We shall correct this fault by giving a precise definition of cause and effect. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Cause and effect is either:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rules in Judging Causes and Effects</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-15/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-15/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;it-is-easy-to-give-rules-but-hard-to-implement-them&#34;&gt;It is Easy to Give Rules, But Hard to Implement Them&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Experience is needed to know whether an object is the cause of another object.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Anything can produce anything.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Creation, annihilation, motion, reason, and volition may arise from one another, or from any other object that we can imagine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reason of Animals</title>
      <link>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-16/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.superphysics.org/research/hume/treatise/book-1/part-3/section-16/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;animals-have-reason-just-as-humans-have-reason&#34;&gt;Animals Have Reason Just as Humans Have Reason&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- Next to the ridicule of denying an evident truth, is the ridicule of taking much pains to defend it. --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The most obvious truth is that beasts have thought and reason just like humans.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
